Apollo and Emailx

More than contacts. Conversations worth having.

Q: Do I need to move my lead data?

No. Export the segment you want to work and import it into Emailx. Apollo stays as it is, and nothing is migrated or deleted.

Q: Can I review messages before they send?

Yes. Every draft can be approved or edited before it queues, and your edits feed back into how the next batch is written. Approved rules can run it once you trust the output.

Q: How is Emailx different from a sending tool?

A sequencer delivers whatever you write, at whatever volume you set. Emailx does the research, writes from it in your voice, scores the draft and checks every claim before the message reaches a queue. Sending is the last step, not the product.

Q: Is there a native Apollo integration?

Not today. The workflow is an export from Apollo and an import into Emailx. We would rather say that plainly than imply a connection that does not exist.

Apollo is a large contact database with sequencing attached. Emailx is built for the part that decides whether anyone answers: finding a real reason to write, writing it individually, and handling the reply.

Start free Talk to us

KeepApolloasaleadsource,orreplacethesequencer.

Eitherway,themessagechanges.

The practical distinction

What each tool is actually for

Apollo

Lead source and broad sequencing

A large built-in B2B contact database
Filters and saved searches to build lists at volume
Sequences that send the same message to many people

Together

Fewer generic sends, more real conversations

Volume goes down, relevance and reply quality go up
Your domain is protected rather than burned through
Replies arrive with the context that produced them

Emailx

Signal-led targeting and individual writing

Targets on what changed, not just on who matches a filter
Writes each message from research, in your voice
Owns delivery, sending health and reply handling

What you get

Three things that change when you move past sequences

[01]

Find intent, not just contacts

A filter match tells you someone fits. A role change, a funding round or an open hiring page tells you why now. Emailx targets on what changed and shows the source next to the sentence it produced.

Moved to VP SalesThree weeks ago · owns the numberIntent

Hiring four SDRs in EMEACareers page · this weekIntent

Matches your saved filterAn Apollo list row, not a triggerContext only

[02]

Stop sending template-shaped messages

Emailx learns from the emails you have already sent and drafts from frameworks that have measurably worked. Every draft is scored on relevance and voice, and each claim is checked against the research before it can queue.

Saw you opened an EMEA office and are hiring four SDRs into it.

Traced to the careers page

Ramp is usually the thing that bites at that headcount.

Matched to your sent mail

I hope this email finds you well.

Not how you write, removed

[03]

Turn replies into pipeline

A reply halts the sequence immediately and the thread moves to one inbox with the research that produced it attached, so the follow-up is a conversation rather than the next step in an automation.

Anna Chen Relates

Saw you opened an EMEA office and are hiring four SDRs into it.

We are. Ramp is exactly what worries me. Thursday works.

Reply detected. Sequence stopped, thread moved to your inbox.

How to move

Move from Apollo sequences to Emailx

You do not have to switch everything at once, and there is no native Apollo integration today. Run one campaign in parallel and compare the replies.

[01]
Keep Apollo as the lead source, at first
Export a segment you already run: same ICP, same seniority, same territory. Nothing about your prospecting changes yet.
[02]
Import it and set your ICP in Emailx
Emailx qualifies each contact before spending research on it, so the weaker half of a filtered list never enters a campaign.
[03]
Run one campaign in parallel
Keep your Apollo sequence running for a matched segment and send the Emailx campaign alongside it. Compare replies, not opens.
[04]
Move the sending layer when the numbers say so
Once the comparison is clear, point your mailboxes at Emailx and keep Apollo for whatever it is still the best tool for, or retire it.

[ HONEST FIT ]

Data layer

Keep Apollo when

You need a built-in contact database and do not want to source data separately
You want prospecting, dialer and sequencing bundled in one seat
Your motion genuinely depends on high-volume, low-touch sending

“Emailx is the most promising solution we've used at Kashew. Julien is building the future of AI outreach.”

Francesco De ContoCo-founder, Kashew

4.1%Average email reply rateMeasured across Emailx campaigns

25.5%Average LinkedIn reply rateMeasured across Emailx campaigns

72%Preferred Emailx messages in a blind comparisonBlind comparison against competitor-generated outreach

FAQ

Common questions

Still deciding? Talk to our team.

Can I keep using Apollo?

Yes. Plenty of teams keep Apollo as the contact source and run the outreach in Emailx. You can also replace the sequencer entirely once you have compared the two on a matched segment.

Do I need to move my lead data?

Can I review messages before they send?

How is Emailx different from a sending tool?

Is there a native Apollo integration?